Antibiotic prophylaxis before amniocentesis.

نویسندگان

  • John C Hobbins
  • Gianluigi Pilu
  • Alfred Abuhumad
  • Zarko Alfirevic
  • Ray O Bahado-Singh
  • Beryl R Benacerraf
  • Richard L Berkowitz
  • Irene Cetin
  • Joshua A Copel
  • Sturla Eik-Nes
  • Tiziana Frusca
  • Henry L Galan
  • Secondo Guaschino
  • Maurice J Mahoney
  • Karel Marsal
  • Gustavo Malinger
  • Anna Maria Marconi
  • Pasquale Martinelli
  • Thomas R Moore
  • Aris T Papageorghiou
  • Lawrence D Platt
  • Nicola Rizzo
  • Ann Tabor
  • Baskaran Thilaganathan
  • Ilan E Timor-Tritsch
  • Tullia Todros
  • Simcha Yagel
چکیده

We are writing to make your readers aware of events stemming from a published Letter to the Editor in Prenatal Diagnosis (Ferrazzi, 2010) that has led to actions that could appreciably threaten our future ability to discuss and pose questions about methods chosen and conclusions drawn by authors of published papers. In a Letter to the Editor, Professor Enrico Ferrazzi (Ferrazzi, 2010) asked some important questions about the methodology, informed consent, oversight, and follow-up procedures in a study by Giorlandino et al. (2009) that involved the use of antibiotics to diminish procedure-related fetal loss following second trimester amniocentesis. The study had been a subject of a previous Letter to the Editor (Alfirevic and Pilu, 2009), who had suggested that the study results ‘must be interpreted with caution’. In his letter, Professor Ferrazzi addressed some other aspects of the study, and he requested that the authors provide additional information for clarification. Unfortunately, this triggered a lawsuit against Professor Ferrazzi, filed in an Italian court by Professor Giorlandino, based on the contention that the letter caused ‘moral damages’, and that it resulted in a loss of revenue for the private corporation headed by Professor Giorlandino. Letters to the Editor represent invaluable avenues for open exchange of ideas and investigative debate that often reflect directly on patient care. This has long been a part of the scientific process, which also includes an internal review of the letter itself. Specifically, Letters to the Editor allow members of the scientific community to openly comment, criticize, and seek clarification on what has been reported in original articles. In essence, it has epitomized academic freedom at work. The common practice has been for authors simply to address in print the concerns of the letter writer, and then to move on. In this case the response was not just to answer (Giorlandino et al., 2010), but to sue. This response to a letter of scientific query could dissuade, if not completely stifle anyone’s desire to question in print ANY published paper. We believe that academic leaders, the editors of scientific journals, and the academic community at large, should be aware of what is transpiring in Italy, and be alert to the potentially chilling implications of this lawsuit. We believe that Prof. Ferrazzi is entitled to write a letter to the editor expressing his concerns, and we sincerely hope that this anomalous response to a legitimate scientific inquiry will go no further. JohnC.Hobbins, Gianluigi Pilu, Alfred Abuhumad, Zarko Alfirevic, Ray O. Bahado-Singh, Beryl R. Benacerraf , Richard L. Berkowitz, Irene Cetin, Joshua A. Copel, Sturla Eik-Nes, Tiziana Frusca, Henry L. Galan, Secondo Guaschino, Maurice J. Mahoney, Karel Marsal, Gustavo Malinger, Anna Maria Marconi, Pasquale Martinelli, Thomas R. Moore, Aris T. Papageorghiou, Lawrence D. Platt, Nicola Rizzo, Ann Tabor, Baskaran Thilaganathan, Ilan E. Timor-Tritsch, Tullia Todros and Simcha Yagel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bologna, Italy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA Division of Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool, Merseyside, England Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA Diagnostic Ultrasound Associates, Boston, MA, USA Columbia University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York, NY, USA Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan, Italy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA National Center for Fetal Medicine, St. Olav’s Hospital, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Brescia, Italy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy Yale University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stratford, CT Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, University Hospital MAS, Malmö, Sweden Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel AOU, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Naples, Italy Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA Fetal Medicine Unit, St. George’s University of London, London, England Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Uterine fibroids and risk for complications following second-trimester amniocentesis.

OBJECTIVE To compare the abortion rate and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) after amniocentesis in women who have undergone antibiotic prophylaxis with uterine fibroids and control. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study using the Antibiotic Prophylaxis before Second-Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis trial database carried out between January 1999 and December 2005 at the Artemisia Feta...

متن کامل

Antibiotic prophylaxis before amniocentesis: a proven and effective method to preserve fetal life.

APGA trial (Giorlandino et al., 2009) is today the biggest randomized controlled trial (RCT) ever performed in prenatal diagnosis, designed accurately to eliminate all possible confounders and to concentrate the results exclusively on a unique variable: the antibiotic. In this phase, it was imperative to eliminate any bias and to administer the study in only one centre by only one operator. The...

متن کامل

The SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist optimizes timing of antibiotic prophylaxis

BACKGROUND Surgical site infection (SSI) is an adverse event in which a close relation between process of care and outcome has been demonstrated: administration of antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of SSI. In our tertiary referral centre, a SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist was developed and implemented. This multidisciplinary checklist covers the entire surgical pathwa...

متن کامل

Comparing the effectiveness of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with single agent antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent post-cesarean section infection

Introduction: The rate of cesarean delivery is increasing. Infection is one of the most frequent and important complications of emergency cesarean section. Infection prophylaxis has an important role to reduce post-cesarean delivery complication. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis (Azithromycin+Cephalotin) with single agent antibiotic...

متن کامل

Antibiotic prophylaxis in otolaryngologic surgery

AIM  Antibiotic prophylaxis aims to prevent infection of surgical sites before contamination or infection occurs. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis does not enhance the prevention of surgical infection and is associated with higher rates of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. This review of the literature concerning antibiotic prophylaxis, with an emphasis on otolaryngologic surgery, aims to de...

متن کامل

Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary in patients undergoing ureterolithotripsy?

Transurethral Ureterolithotripsy (TUL) is a frequently used procedure in urology departments. Many urologists perform TUL without antibiotic prophylaxis; however the use of chemoprophylaxis before TUL remains a controversial issue in urology. This study was carried out to assess the safety of omitting antibiotic prophylaxis prior to TUL. In a prospective randomized clinical trial from January 2...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Prenatal diagnosis

دوره 31 12  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011